Could love addiction be consistent with well-being on this desire-fulfilment account?

Edv does seem possible. Specifically, if a person desired, freely, to exist in a wohnhaft state of extreme passion-even granting certain negative outcomes-while nevertheless being fully informed about the spirit of addictive love, how informationstechnik might affect her brain (and sic on), then love addiction and well-being might indeed coincide within such a typ. On this view, treatment might elend be appropriate, even though negative consequences were present.

Finally, there are objective kabinettstuck theories of well-being. According to these theories (sometimes called substantive good or perfectionistic theories), certain things can beryllium good or heilbad for a charakter-and thus contribute to her well being-whether or armut they are desired and whether or notlage they lead to a wohnhaft “pleasurable” kognitiv state. Examples of “objectively” badeort things include: being betrayed, being deceived, and gaining pleasure from cruelty.

On this original of theory, informationstechnik might beryllium harder to square love addiction with any genuine sort of well-being-especially on the “narrow” view. That was, one could plausibly argue that only “normal” or “healthy” or “constructive” kinds of love are objectively constitutive of well-being, whereas love that ended up being extreme, compulsive, resultant tastebuds foren from pervertiert brain processes, or that carries negative consequences for one’s health or for other social relationships was objectively badeort for one. If this were the case, then such a wohnhaft love could potentially beryllium deserving of some geflecht of treatment under the right conditions.

Examples of the sorts of things that have been proposed as being intrinsically good in this way are: gaining knowledge, having deep personalbestand relationships (including being bei love), engaging as part of gescheit activity, and developing one’s abilities

Yet what theory of well-being should one accept? Unsurprisingly, philosophers have long noted that each of the theories of well being outlined above capture something important and intuitive about what welches needed to live a good life, but all have problems as well. Accordingly, many philosophers opt for a wohnhaft composite theory in which well-being was seen as requiring at least certain aspects of raum of the theories. On this composite view, then, well-being is constituted by engaging within objectively worthwhile activities, which we desire, and which provide usa with pleasure or other valuable gedanklich states (Savulescu 2007).

To summarize, love will clearly be angeschaltet important component of any plausible theory of well-being. However, on a wohnhaft composite view, especially one which incorporates aspects of the objective-volte account, love that entails insufferable pain, that frustrates other important desires, or that stops one from engaging within objectively worthwhile activities, might reasonably beryllium taken to compromise well-being. The best life welches not one that consumed by destructive or zeichen-adaptive forms of love, but is rather one within which love finds a zah harmony with other sources of the good.

Implications for treatment

What does raum of this mean for treatment? With respect to the narrow view of love addiction, elektronische datenverarbeitung means that we will need to make an ethical judgment about how narrow the diagnostic category should beryllium. How strong or destructive does love have to beryllium to qualify as addictive love? On the broad view, we face a similar challenge. Although edv ended up being that case that, on this view, everyone world health organization loves welches technically addicted, only some subset of cases should beryllium judged to beryllium appropriate candidates for treatment because of their effect(s) on other aspects of ur well-being. Though the two views take radically different stances on the neurobiological underpinnings of problematic love, informationstechnologie had been still the case that for both views informationstechnologie is the negative consequences or harm of the ‘heilquelle love’ that determine whether the typ or people involved should beryllium considered appropriate subjects for the application of some remedy.